Today's meeting felt quite fruitful. We started out with an update from me - I basically outlined for the group what kind of data we should be able to access sometime in the future, once the SDK is available and more accessible. I also told the group how the pen timestamps strokes. Chris asked about how fine-grained the timestamp is.
Whitney then reported that she was still very unsatisfied with the current state of both ethograms. She is also not thinking that they are fully taking advantage of what the pens can offer and record. She said she had gone back and reflected deeply on the kinds of questions the project is trying to answer.
Chris led the group through a very careful outline of all the data that needs to get recorded. We started out with the
All Occurrences sheet. What behaviors
need to be captured?
Breathing - rate important for SeaWorld to know animals are healthy
Nursing - again, indicates health of infant
Floating - too much could indicate unhealth
Bubbles - indicates breathing, and can pinpoint who vocalized if unknown
Chris pointed out that both events and states are recorded here. Separating them can be useful.
Possible States:-Floating
-Static underwater
-Swimming
-Floating
-Spyhopping
Possible Events:-Breathing
-Nursing
-Surfacing (B only, M only, B-->M, M-->B, Synch.)
-Diving (B only, M only, B-->M, M-->B, Synch.)
Chris also noted that it is important to know what
state an animal is in when it performs an
event. The timestamped pen data can help delineate this. There may also be a work-around (/) to point out state changes during a time block.
_________________
Interaction/Relative Dynamics Sheet
We had a discussion about the importance of recording proximity information. Whitney had outlined a proximity scale, and we discussed/refined definitions.
0 - touching/in contact
1 - slipstream (baby or less width apart)
3 - proximal (adult to baby's width apart)
5 - other
We also talked about the importance of relative orientations. Chris sketched out several possibilities (shown on attached sheet). We brainstormed about putting pictures of postural configurations along the top of the sheet. In the current version of the sheet, we can assign values to the orientations. In the future, we can assign Anoto address space to these icons, and touching the pen in the box will trigger a recording event.
The quality of the contact between mother and baby is important too. We decided what kind of touches are important - all, or just a subset? Is fluke to fluke important to know, or is just a touch in general enough to know about. We decided that the only important touches were touches at the mammary area of mother, and rostral touches. Rostral touches are touches where the ecolocation organ is facing the target - might indicate that some kind of spatial mapping development is going on? Therefore, the touch categories are:
On mother: On baby:
Rostral Rostral
Mammary Body
Body
Play behavior is also important to record, as it may indicate imitation activities.
**The researchers also pointed out an additional feature of using the LiveScribe pens to pilot this study - they can record meta-level observations of data collection while simultaneously taking data, i.e. "We really should add another column for xyz..."
____________________________
Remaining questions:
How fine-grained is the timestamp?
What is the human error between two scorers?
Can we mock up something for next week, using transparency sheets, and??